There is no single, generally-accepted, definition of public administration, and perhaps there never will be.1 In this chapter, we explain why this is so, and while the absence of a single definition may be frustrating, it at least partially reflects healthy "growing pains" of a young, complex, and thus highly interesting field of academic study and practice.
Public administration may be defined as all processes, organizations, and individuals ... associated with carrying out laws and other rules adopted or issued by legislatures, executives, and courts.2 (Emphasis in original.)
Public administration is so vast that there is no way to encompass it all with only one definition.3
Public administration, like many human endeavors, is difficult to define.... In part, this is because public administration covers such a vast amount of activity. ... It was pointed out some time ago that any one-paragraph or even one-sentence definition of public administration is bound to prove temporarily mind-paralyzing.4
To define a subject is to fix its boundaries or, if those turn out to be fuzzy, to identify its essence, its core character. But for public administration this has proved so intractable a problem that its scholarly study is said to be suffering a "crisis of identity."5
All of us who teach public administration have our own sense of what it is, and most of us would agree about many aspects of a definition. "Public administration does involve activity, it is concerned with politics and policy-making, it tends to be concentrated in the executive branch of government, it does differ from private [business] administration, and it is concerned with implementing the law."6 On the other hand, we also disagree spiritedly about where the "boundaries" of public administration lie and about the relative importance of various dimensions of public administration. 自20世纪80年代恢复以来,行政管理学在我国经历了十多年的摸索和积累期,世纪之交终于呈现出飞跃式发展的态势:行政管理学博士点相继设立,公共管理获得一级学科的地位,公共管理专业硕士学位(MPA)教育开始启动且发展迅猛,开设行政管理本科专业的大专院校达到130家,公共事业管理本科专业则突破了300家,加上党校、行政学院公共管理教研机构的大量设立,说公共管理是21世纪初我国发展*迅猛的学科并不夸张。
学科飞跃式发展的另一重要标志是新领域的开拓和知识的积累及其快速更新。**自然科学基金委员会对与宏观管理相关的117种外文期刊进行的文献计量研究表明:“公共管理理论与方法是1994--2004年间国外关注*多的领域。其中,有关公共管理基本理论与方法的论文数占到了全部论文总量的44.6%。”对中国期刊网77种核心期刊的文献计量学分析的结果显示,“自1994年至2003年的十年间,关于公共管理基本理论与方法方面的论文增长迅速,从1994年的554篇,上升到2003年的1934篇,增幅达到3倍以上”。但在总量上仅占全部论文总量的4.59%,与国外的同类研究相比呈现出明显的差距(**自然科学基金会管理科学部:《宏观管理与政策学科“十一五”发展战略研究报告》)。
系统了解和追踪国外的新理论和新方法,并在批判的基础上加以消化和吸收,是学科知识积累和更新的重要环节之一。进入21世纪后,我国对西方公共管理著作的翻译出版结束了零星分散的状态,呈现出系统化和细分化同时并进的势头。中国人民大学出版社的《公共行政与公共管理经典译丛》和《公共政策经典译丛》,华夏出版社的《政治学与行政管理学译丛》,上海三联书店的《制度分析与公共政策译丛》,中国青年出版社的《公共管理译丛》等,都对学科发展和政府管理现代化产生了积极的影响。北京大学出版社《公共管理学经典教材原版影印丛书》的出版值得庆贺!