网站购物车   | 店铺购物车  
店铺平均得分:99.92 分,再接再厉!!!【查看全部评价】
评分 40分 50分 60分 70分 80分 90分 100分
数量 0 0 0 0 1 0 245
本店铺共有 0 笔投诉记录,投诉率 0% ,低于平均投诉率 1% 【查看详细】
投诉类型
数量
比例
店主称呼:朱林   联系方式:购买咨询请联系我  18132737716    地址:河北省 保定市 涿州市 码头镇浮落营村
促销广告:本店图书全部全新正品,请放心购买
图书分类
店铺公告
各位书友,您好,本店图书都是全新正品图书 ,喜欢的可以直接下单购买,如有疑问,可以拨打电话或加入QQ联系,谢谢广大书友的支持!
店铺介绍
各位书友大家好本店铺书都是特价正版书的社科书跟专业书 请大家放心购买谢谢
交易帮助
第一步:选择图书放入购物车。
第二步:结算、填写收货地址。
第三步:担保付款或银行汇款。
第四步:卖家发货。
第五步:确认收货、评价。
高级英语(第三版)(2)(同步测试)
出版日期:2012年09月
ISBN:9787513524377 [十位:7513524378]
页数:181      
定价:¥25.90
店铺售价:¥10.60 (为您节省:¥15.30
店铺库存:4
注:您当前是在入驻店铺购买,非有路网直接销售。
正在处理购买信息,请稍候……
我要买: * 如何购买
** 关于库存、售价、配送费等具体信息建议直接联系店主咨询。
联系店主:购买咨询请联系我  18132737716
本店已缴纳保证金,请放心购买!【如何赔付?】
买家对店铺的满意度评价:查看更多>>
评分
评价内容
评论人
订单图书
《高级英语(第三版)(2)(同步测试)》内容提要:
《**英语(第3版)(2)(同步测试)》具有以下主要特色:
每单元试题与教材同步,考查学生对课文主题、背景知识、语言要点、篇章结构及修辞手法的掌握程度。
试题设计遵循语言测试原理和规范,注重语言的综合运用,题型和难度参照英语专业八级及其他同等水平考试要求。
整体内容突出人文内涵,引导学生在进行语言学习的同时,注重对文化知识的学习和积累。 **英语(第三版)(2)(同步测试)_王俊菊 等主编,张兆刚 等编_外语教学与研究出版社_
《高级英语(第三版)(2)(同步测试)》图书目录:
Test 1 Pub Talk and the King's English
Test 2 Marrakech
Test 3 Inaugural Address
Test 4 Love Is a Fallacy
Test 5 The Sad Young Men
Test 6 Loving and Hating New York
Test 7 The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas (Excerpts)
Test 8 The Future of the English
Test 9 The Loons
Test 10 The Discovery of What It Means to Be an American
Test 11 Four Laws of Ecology (Part Ⅰ )
Test 12 Four Laws of Ecology (Part Ⅱ)
Test 13 The Mansion: A Subprime Parable (Excerpts)
Test 14 Faustian Economics
Test 15 Disappearing Through the Skylight
KEY
《高级英语(第三版)(2)(同步测试)》文章节选:
4. Fortunately, some simple steps can be taken immediately to make America's waste less hazardous, as the Blue Ribbon Commission notes. Spent fuel can be moved after a period of cooling from pools to dry storage in casks that are disaster-and sabotage-resistant and durable enough to store waste safely for many decades. The commission suggests that some of these casks be consolidated in regional, well-guarded interim storage facilities away from disaster-prone zones until geological repositories open up. Meanwhile, the commission also recommends that the U.S. government start a consensus-based process of finding new sites for such underground disposal facilities, though the commission stops short of suggesting just where they should be. Transparency is key: Sweden and Finland recently succeeded in this task in large part because they made the (honest) case that nuclear waste that remains above ground poses a much greater threat than buried waste, even to nearby communities.
5. Most of the attention on the commission's work has rightly focused on its efforts to create a process that will lead to the opening of a new Yucca Mountain-like facility But there's another, often overlooked aspect of its analysis that is equally critical: how U.S. policy toward nuclear waste can affect the spread of nuclear weapons around the globe.
6. Nonproliferation campaigners have long warned about a method of handling nuclear waste called reprocessing, in which waste from reactors is chemically treated to isolate and remove fissionable plutonium, which can then be turned into a new fuel, called mixed oxide. That fuel can then be reused in reactors. In theory, reprocessing is designed to reduce the amount of waste at large and increase the efficiency of uranium-reactor fuel; in practice, it is prohibitively expensive, requiring subsidies to make viable, and does not obviate the need for the disposal of the massive quantities of radioactive waste that remain. More importantly, plutonium separated from nuclear waste during reprocessing can also be used to create nuclear bombs. Less than 20 Ib. (9 kg) of the stuff could turn downtown Manhattan into a broiling wasteland of irradiated rubble.
7. The Blue Ribbon Commission doesn't reach a conclusion on whether the U.S. should pursue reprocessing, arguing that consensus on the issue would be "premature." That is a mistake. Reprocessing is a manifestly dangerous technology. In the 1970s, the U.S. renounced commercial reprocessing at home and the spread of the technology abroad because of concerns that it would lead to weapons proliferation. It should not reverse this policy. The spread of reprocessing to countries in unstable or nuclear-armed regions gives them the infrastructure and expertise needed to quickly develop a bomb should they choose to do so. (And don't think safeguards imposed by the International Atomic Energy Agency can stop them. Commercial-scale reprocessing facilities handle so much plutonium that it is almost impossible for inspectors to keep track of it all.) The U.S. must send a message: if the country with the world's largest number of nuclear reactors renounces reprocessing, it delivers a clear signal to countries newly interested in nuclear power that the process is not necessary for the future of the nuclear industry.
……